ANTENATAL AND PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
1979 Brock DJ, Hayward
C. Methylumbelliferyl-guanidinobenzoate reactive proteases and prenatal diagnosis
of cystic fibrosis. Lancet 1979; i: 1245-1246. [PubMed]
The titration of trypsin like proteases in cell free amniotic fluid against
an artificial substrate, 4methylumbelliferyl-guanidinobezoate which had been
proposed as a means of antenatal diagnosis by Nadler et al (Lancet 1980; ii:
96-97; Nadler HL, Walsh MMJ. Pediatrics 1980; 66:690-692). [PubMed] looked hopeful but could not be reproduced in other centres resulting in an
unacceptable number of false negative and false positive results (Tummler B
et al. Clin Chem Acta 1982; 125:219-232). [PubMed]
1983
Carbens NJB, Gosden G, Brock DJH. Microvillar peptidase activity in amniotic
fluid: possible use in prenatal diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Lancet 1983; i:
329-331.[PubMed]
The activities of two amniotic fluid peptidases were significantly depressed
in the second trimester amniotic fluid supernatant in the presence of a fetus
affected by cystic fibrosis. Eventually David Brock, of Edinburgh, used monoclonal
antibody specific for isoenzyme of alkaline phosphatase (see below). Eventually
both methods were superseded by superior DNA based methods.
1983 Brock DJH.
Amniotic fluid alkaline phosphatase isoenzymes in early prenatal diagnosis of
cystic fibrosis. Lancet 1983; ii: 941-943. [PubMed]
Antenatal diagnosis in families with a known CF child was possible by assay
of the microvillus enzymes at 17-18th week of pregnancy. In pregnancies with
a CF fetus there was a profound deficiency of one form of alkaline phosphatase
(the phenylalanine-inhibitable form). When phenylalanine and homoarginine were
used to define the alkaline phosphatase isoenzymes in stored amniotic fluid,
9 out of 10 cases of CF were identified (Brock DH et al, Hum Genet 1984; 65:
248-251; Brock DH et al, Hum Genet 1988; 78:271-275).
David Brock later (1993) commented that assay of microvillar enzymes in the
second trimester amniotic fluid supernatant had a rational physiological basis
and had stood the test of time but eventually it was superseded by superior
DNA-based methods.
1985 Brock DJH,
Befgood D, Barron L, Haward C. Prospective prenatal diagnosis of cystic fibrosis.
Lancet 1985; I: 1175-1178.
An immunoassay based on monoclonal antibodies with specificity for the three
major isoenzymes of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was used in second-trimester
prenatal diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. When prospective and retrospective data
were summed the sensitivity of the test was 91% (39 of 43) and the false-positive
rate 6% (5 of 81). The authors concluded that this was probably an acceptable
form of prenatal diagnosis of CF for the high-risk mother at the time.
David Brock of Edinburgh pioneered antenatal diagnosis prior to the identification
of the probes in close proximity to the CF gene in 1985. He had previously made
major contributions to the antenatal recognition of spina bifida.
1986 Farrell M,
Law HY, Rodeck CH, Warren R, Stanier P, Super M, Lissens W, Scambler P, Watson
E, Wainwright B, et al. First-trimester prenatal diagnosis of cystic fibrosis
with linked DNA probes. Lancet 1986; i: 1402-1405.
More accurate antenatal diagnosis using the new linked probes was described
in 1985. Linkage analysis with cloned gene probes has shown that the mutation
causing cystic fibrosis was located in the middle of the long arm of chromosome
7. In this paper first-trimester diagnosis of cystic fibrosis is reported in
four informative families and second-trimester diagnosis in one family with
fetal DNA prepared from chorionic villi, hybridised with the tightly linked
DNA probes, pJ3.11 and met. Risk calculations show that the expected false-negative
and false-positive rates are approximately 2% and 6%, respectively, for typical
nuclear families with one affected living child.
The authors considered existing probes to be sufficiently informative now to
allow full diagnosis in about two-thirds of couples presenting with at least
one affected child. In half of the remainder, the inheritance of one parental
mutant chromosome could be deduced.
1989 Handyside AH,
Pattinson JK, Penketh RJ, Delhanty JD, Winston RM, Tuddenham EG. Biopsy of human
preimplantation embryos and sexing by DNA amplification. Lancet 1989; 1 (8634):347-349. [PubMed]
The first biopsy of a rabbit embryo had been performed in 1968 (Edwards RG &
Gardner RL New Scientist 1968; 38:218-2). In this present paper Handyside and
colleagues from the Hammersmith Hospital, London, reported the first unaffected
child born following preimplantation genetic diagnosis for an X-linked disorder.
A single cell was removed through a hole in the zona pellucida from each of
30 human embryos at the 6-10 cell stage three days after in vitro fertilisation.
A normal proportion developed (37%) to the blastocyst stage and six hatched
from the zona. Each male embryo was sexed from DNA amplification of a repeated
sequence specific for the Y chromosomes. In 15 embryos with the normal two pronuclei
the sex was also determined by in situ hybridisation.
Although at this stage not performed for CF, this technique of pre-implantation
genetic diagnosis, was to prove a major advance for some CF carrier couples
at high risk of having a CF infant, as it provided an alternative to prenatal
diagnosis and termination if the fetus was affected – a course of action
which was understandably unacceptable to many couples. The technique was first
used for CF in 1992 (Handyside et al, 1992 below).
1992 Mennie ME,
Gilfillan A, Compton M, Curtis L, Liston WA, Pullen I, Whyte DA, Brock DJH.
Prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis. Lancet 1992; 340:214-216. [PubMed]
This is the first report of antenatal couple screening for CF in the
Edinburgh maternity hospitals. Of 4348 women, 14% declined prenatal screening
and 13% were not screened for other reasons. Amongst 3165 women
there were 111 carriers detected of whom four had carrier partners and all 4
couples opted for prenatal diagnosis. One pregnancy with an affected fetus was
terminated. The importance of adequate counselling was stressed.
Antenatal screening for CF became routine in Edinburgh but was eventually discontinued
in 2005 for various reasons including the improving prognosis for CF and also
the introduction of neonatal screening in Scotland (also Brock 1985 above; Livingstone
et al, 1994 below). National antenatal CF carrier screening had not been introduced
in the UK by 2011 although accepted in principle by the UK National Screening
Committee
1994 Super M, Schwarz
MJ, Malone G, Roberts T, Haworth A, Dermody G. Active cascade screening for
carriers of cystic fibrosis gene. BMJ 1994; 308:1462-1467. [PubMed]
Dr Maurice Super (1936-2006) (figure 30) first
encountered CF in Windhoek in South West Africa (Namibia) in 1967 where he started
a CF clinic. He subsequently became a leading geneticist and paediatrician in
the UK working in Manchester. He was a major protagonist of carrier screening
in the extended families of people with cystic fibrosis – so-called “cascade
screening”. The present paper describes 15 carrier couples detected out
of 1563 relatives of people with CF who were tested; eight had prenatal tests
and three pregnancies were terminated. An average of 16 people per family had
been tested. Cascade screening was acceptable to relatives, particularly on
the mother’s side of the family and 10 times more successful in detecting
carrier couples than unfocused screening.
The genetic testing of all child-bearing relatives of a person with CF is now
provided by the UK NHS if the individuals wish to be tested.
1994 Livingstone
J, Axton RA, Gilfillan A, Mennie M, Compton M, Liston WA, Liston WA, Calder
AA, Gordon AJ, Brock DJ. Antenatal screening for cystic fibrosis: a trial of
the couple model. BMJ 1994; 308:1459-1462. [PubMed]
The second report of antenatal screening of 8536 couples in Edinburgh. 8.4%
were “ineligible”, 1900 declined screening for various reasons and
5922 (69.4%) were screened. There were four positives (i.e. both partners were
CF carrier heterozygotes) and all four couples opted for prenatal diagnosis.
There were three terminations where the fetus was affected and one couple elected
to have the CF infant. There was 99% satisfaction by those screened.
Antenatal CF screening was pioneered in Edinburgh by David Brock and his colleagues
and this is one of the first reports (also Mennie et al, 1992 first report above).
Screening was introduced into the two Edinburgh trial hospitals following this
report. However, the service was eventually discontinued in 2005 soon after
neonatal CF screening was introduced into Scotland. As the outlook for CF improved
parental attitudes changed to antenatal diagnosis and termination, also the
mutations tested differed from the neonatal ones, and finally funding for both
antenatal and neonatal screening was inadequate. It has been estimated from
various studies that for every CF fetus detected by antenatal screening the
cost is between £50K and £100K.
1996 Brock DJH.
Prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis: 5 years’ experience reviewed.
Lancet 1996; 347:148-150. [PubMed]
Antenatal screening had been available at two maternity clinics in Edinburgh,
UK, since January, 1992, first on a research basis and then routinely. 25,000
couples had been screened. The take-up rates for the two-step and couple models
of delivery were very similar at about 70%. Of 22 high-risk couples identified
entirely through screening, 20 (91%) opted for prenatal diagnosis. Four couples
returned for second and two for third monitored pregnancies. In all eight cases
where affected fetuses were identified, pregnancy was terminated.
David Brock concluded that “these data remove one of the few remaining
obstacles to a general implementation of prenatal screening for CF”. However,
although prenatal screening was recommended in the UK by a Health Technology
Assessment (Murray et al, 1999) and after this was accepted in principle by
the National Screening Committee, prenatal screening had not been introduced
in the UK by 2011. Furthermore, antenatal CF screening was discontinued in the
Edinburgh hospitals in 2005 on grounds of both cost and also the introduction
of neonatal screening and the evidence of improving prognosis for infants with
CF diagnosed soon after birth (also Mennie et al, 1992 above; Livingstone et
al, 1994 above).
1998 Cunningham
S, Marshall T. Influence of five years of antenatal screening on the paediatric
cystic fibrosis population in one region. Arch Dis Child 1998; 78:345-348. [PubMed]
The incidence of CF in the five years before and after antenatal screening
was introduced in Edinburgh decreased from 4.6 to 1.6 infants per year –
a reduction greater than could be accounted for by prenatal diagnosis and termination.
Much of the early work on antenatal screening during the Eighties was done in
Edinburgh by David Brock and his colleagues (Brock 1992; Livingstone et al.
1994; Brock, 1996 all above). It is disappointing that the antenatal screening
which Brock pioneered was eventually abandoned in Edinburgh and has not been
introduced elsewhere in the UK. The introduction of neonatal CF screening in
Scotland and the steady improvement in prognosis, being two reasons given for
withdrawal of the antenatal screening in Edinburgh. Financial reasons prevented
introduction in England.
2003 Simon-Bouy B. Satre V. Ferec C. Malinge MC. Girodon E. Denamur E. Leporrier N. Lewin P. Forestier F. Muller F. French Collaborative Group. Hyperechogenic fetal bowel: a large French collaborative study of 682 cases. Am J Med Genet 2003; Part A. 121A:209-213. [PubMed] Hyperechogenic fetal bowel is detected in 0.1-1.8% of pregnancies during the second or third trimester. This 1997-1998 multicenter study in 22 molecular biology laboratories identified 682 cases of hyperechogenic fetal bowel detected by routine ultrasound examination during the second (86%) or third trimester. The fetal bowel was considered hyperechogenic when its echogenicity was broadly similar to, or greater than, that of the surrounding bone. Karyotyping, screening for viral infection, and screening for cystic fibrosis mutations were performed in all cases. Pregnancy outcome and postnatal follow-up were obtained in 656 of the 682 cases (91%). In 447 cases (65.5%), a normal birth was observed. Multiple malformations were observed in 47 cases (6.9%), a significant chromosomal anomaly was noted in 24 (3.5%), cystic fibrosis in 20 (3%), and viral infection in 19 (2.8%). In utero unexplained fetal death occurred in 1.9% of cases, toxemia in 1.2%, IUGR in 4.1%, and premature birth in 6.2%.
This study demonstrates that this ultrasound sign is potentially associated with medically significant outcomes. Having established that the bowel is hyperechogenic, recommended investigations should include a detailed scan with Doppler measurements, fetal karyotyping, cystic fibrosis screening, and infectious disease screening. After birth, newborns require pediatric examination because a surgical treatment may be necessary. This should be combined with clear counseling of the parents. This is a very clear and practically useful paper from a large multicentre French study which indicates the significance of hyperechogenic bowel during pregnancy.
2006 Saker A, Benachi
A, Bonnefont JP, Munnich A, Dumez Y, Lacour B, Paterlini-Brechot P. Genetic
characterisation of circulating fetal cells allows non-invasive prenatal diagnosis
of cystic fibrosis. Prenatal Diagnosis 2006; 26:906-916. [PubMed]
The purpose of this study from Paris was to develop a molecular method to characterise
both paternal and maternal CFTR alleles in DNA from circulating fetal cells
(CFCs) isolated by ISET (isolation by size of epithelial tumour/trophoblastic
cells). This protocol was validated in 12 pregnant women, at 11 to 13 weeks
of gestation, whose offspring had a 1 in 4 risk of CF. Results showed that one
fetus was affected, seven were heterozygous carriers of a CFTR mutation, and
four were healthy homozygotes. These findings were consistent with those obtained
by chorionic villus sampling (CVS). This
test affords a reliable method prenatal diagnosis for high risk couples and
avoids the risks associated iatrogenic miscarriage with chorionic biopsy (also
note Fetal DNA detected at 13 weeks of a Q890X carrier fetus by Gonzalez-Gonzalez
MC et al. Prenatal diagnosis 2002; 22:946-948. [PubMed]
2007 Massie J. Forbes
R. Dusart D. Bankier A. Delatycki MB. Community-wide screening for cystic fibrosis
carriers could replace newborn screening for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis.
J Paediatr Child H 2007; 43:721-723. [PubMed]
Most babies
with cystic fibrosis (CF) are born to parents who did not know they were carriers
until their baby was diagnosed with CF, usually by newborn screening. It is
only after the birth of their first child with CF that couples are offered genetic
counselling and reproductive choices. Most use this information for prenatal
testing of subsequent pregnancies. With the high uptake of first trimester screening
for Down syndrome (80% in Victoria, Australia) most couples have had screening
during the CF affected pregnancy. Yet screening for CF carrier status is available,
costs are similar to that for Down syndrome screening and CF carrier screening
only ever needs to be done once. Waiting for couples to have a baby with CF
before they are identified as carriers denies them choice. A national policy
on CF carrier screening in Australia, and determination to equitably fund such
a programme, is required.
Although neonatal screening
for CF has been introduced into many countries. There is now the means of identifying
CF carrier parents which has been available for the last two decades and the
feasibility of antenatal CF screening has been shown by the first studies from
Edinburgh in the UK where such screening was pioneered by the late David Brock
(Mennie ME et al. Lancet 1992; 340:214-216). [PubMed] Also antenatal screening was recommended in a UK Health Technology Assessment
in 1999 (Murray J, Cuckle H, Taylor G, Littlewood J, Hewison J. Screening for
cystic fibrosis. Health Technol Assess 1999;3(8)).[PubMed] and even agreed by the UK National Screening Committee but not introduced because
of the cost (£50K - £100K) for each affected fetus detected and
the lack of the necessary counselling services. 2009 Massie J, Petrou
V, Forbes R, Curnow L, Ioannou L, Dusart D, Bankier A, Delatycki M. Populations
based carrier screening for cystic fibrosis in Victoria: the first three years
experience. Aus NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 49:484-489.[PubMed]
CF carrier screening was offered to 3020 women and couples planning a pregnancy,
or in early pregnancy, through obstetricians and general practitioners in Victoria,
Australia from January 2006 to December 2008. Of the nine carrier couples, six
were pregnant at the time of screening (five natural conception and one in vitro
fertilisation) and all had CVS examination performed (mean gestation 12.5 weeks).
Two fetuses were affected, three were carriers and one was not a carrier. Termination
of pregnancy was undertaken for the affected fetuses. The authors concluded
that carrier screening for CF by obstetricians and general practitioners by
cheek swab sample can be successfully undertaken prior to pregnancy or in the
early stages of pregnancy.
Carrier screening was pioneered by David Brock in Edinburgh but abandoned there apparently as a result of the introduction of neonatal screening becoming available and the prognosis improving. However, antenatal screening has been recommended by a UK Health Technology Assessment report, by the UK National Screening Committee but not implemented on the grounds of expense. Indeed it certainly seems to be an approach which should be available to future parents should they wish it. A downward trend in the incidence of CF has been noted in northeastern Italy where antenatal screening is available (Castellani et al, 2009.[PubMed] ).
2009 Christie LM.
Ingrey AJ. Turner GM. Proos AL. Watts GE. Outcomes of a cystic fibrosis carrier
testing clinic for couples. M J Australia 2009; 191:499-501. [PubMed]
To review
the outcomes of offering carrier testing for cystic fibrosis (CF) to couples
considering pregnancy, and to women in early pregnancy and their partners. An
after-hours clinic was established in Newcastle for discussion of issues related
to prenatal testing. Couples were offered CF carrier testing by extracting DNA
from a mouthwash sample. An expanded one-step model was used with both partners
being tested initially for the p.F508del cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance
regulator gene (CFTR) mutation. If one partner was a p.F508del carrier, the
other partner was tested for an additional 28 CFTR mutations. Of 1000 individuals
who were offered CF carrier testing, none declined. No re-collections of mouthwash
samples were required, and results were available within 14 days. There were 730 individuals who had no family historyof CF(73%);
27 were carriers (4%; 95% CI, 2.4%-5.3%), and there were two high-risk couples
where both partners were carriers of p.F508del. There were 270 individuals
who had an affected family member with CF or a child identified as a CF carrier
through newborn screening; 126 were carriers (46%; 95% CI, 40.6%-52.8%),
and there were two high-risk couples - one couple where both partners were carriers
of p.F508del, and another couple where the woman was homozygous for p.F508del
and the man was a p.F508del carrier. The information on carrier status led the
four high-risk couples to change their reproductive decisions to avoid having
a child with CF.
The authors concluded that CF carrier testing for couples using an expanded one-step model will detect about 80% of high-risk couples and enables various reproductive choices. They believe that all couples considering pregnancy, and women in early pregnancy and their partners, should be offered CF carrier testing.
| top |
